1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant received a summary order of KRW 500,000 on January 19, 201 due to the fact that the plaintiff residing in the same village filed a complaint by defamation against himself/herself, and that the above summary order became final and conclusive on March 7, 2012 is significant in this court.

According to the above facts, the defendant has infringed upon the plaintiff's residence and has harmed the freedom and peace of the plaintiff's residence (hereinafter "the tort of this case"), and the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff as an illegal act of this case.

Furthermore, the Plaintiff’s Defendant abandoned the Plaintiff’s house in his private house.

The defendant asserts that he/she has a duty to compensate for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff, but the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the above fact and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit. The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since he/she spits the plaintiff's face in beer and insults the plaintiff.

In full view of the details, degree, result, etc. of the tort in this case’s tort liability scope and all other circumstances revealed in the argument in this case, it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff’s mental damage caused by the tort in this case’s tort to be KRW 500,00

Then, the defendant.