logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.06.25 2015고단451
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-learning car.

On December 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of about 40 kilometers a speed of 50 kilometers a speed of 40 kilometers a speed of 40 kilometers a speed of two lanes in the direction of the scradddra in the upper direction of the scra zone in the direction of the scradra.

Since a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service is negligent in neglecting the duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the signals, and in violation of the signal, the victim E (E, South and 32 years old) crossing the crosswalk from the right side of the vehicle driving direction to the left side of the pedestrian proceeding in accordance with the pedestrian proceeding signals.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E by occupational negligence, such as “ashed the mouth, etc.,” which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement (simplified traffic) about E;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to the report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the report on a traffic accident, and the medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1)1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 3(2)1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the full agreement with the victim after prosecution, the defendant shows an attitude against the crime of this case, and the defendant has no criminal history, and the opinion of the prosecutor on the punishment,

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the custody of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow