A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 19, 2013, at around 23:02, the Defendant recommended that the police box F of the E box called “D” restaurant located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in receipt of a report, shall return home, and the Defendant assaulted twice the right-hand part of the instant F, with a drinking kneel kneel kneel kneel kneel kneel kneel kneel kneel kneel kne knee kne.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the F police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence List 2);

1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing of the sentence of imprisonment [the decision of the sentence] The obstruction of the performance of official duties/performance of official duties [the case where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor] - January - August [the range of recommending punishment] - August [the decision of the sentence] unfavorable: the defendant has a record of criminal punishment of fines several times of violent crimes; the defendant committed the crime in this case again within 2 months from the date on which the above sentence became final, even though he was sentenced two years of grace due to obstruction of business, etc. on January 2013; the defendant committed the crime in this case again within 2 months from the date on which the above sentence became final; the risk and possibility of criticism as to the repeated repetition of violence related to the violence of the defendant; the injury of the defendant due to the crime is relatively minor; the defendant itself commits the crime in this case, and the circumstances that the defendant did not commit the crime in this case’s age and circumstances after the crime in this case;