logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.23 2015가단5118482
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)

A. Each 1/2 share of the real estate stated in paragraph 1 of the attached Table to Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) A and B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Division of the instant land and the land substitution relation 1) Kim Jong-gun E-ri (hereinafter “Ei”) is limited to “Ei”

F) 539 square meters (in this case, 1,782 square meters are converted into a unit area) and G 519 square meters (in this case, 1,716 square meters are converted into a unit area) are H 40,080 square meters (hereinafter “maintenance prior to the instant subdivision”).

The land divided from the above two lots of land was the land indicated in attached Table 1 (I 3,789 m2) by the replotting under the Act on the Maintenance of Agricultural Infrastructure, Etc. (hereinafter “the land within the two lots of land before the above replotting”) (hereinafter “the land within the two lots of land before the above replotting”), and the land listed in attached Table 1 “the land within the category of the first parcel of land” before the land substitution.

). 2) J 답 1,240평(이후 면적단위 환산으로 4,056㎡가 됨)도 이 사건 분할 전 유지에서 분할된 토지로, 위 토지는 전항 기재 같은 사업에 의한 환지에 의해 현재 별지 목록 제2항 기재 토지(K 답 3,765.9㎡㎡)가 되었다

(hereinafter the above land before replotting is referred to as “second land before replotting”; the land specified in attached Table 2 in attached Table 2 is referred to as “second land”; and the first and second land are collectively referred to, “each land of this case”. (b)

1) The maintenance before the division (H 40,080 square meters) was owned by a Japanese company at the time of the Japanese occupation. Since 20 years prior to the tidal wave, neighboring residents developed farmland by cultivating the maintenance before the division, and have paid a small fee to the said Japanese company. 2) The land first before the replotting is farmlandized as farmland in the above circumstances, and is small by reclaiming L as farmland.

After the piracy, the plaintiff A and B succeeded to the possession of the above land from L and the O continued cultivation.

In addition, the deceased on June 25, 2007 and the deceased O cultivated each of the above lands, and from around 2000, it leased it to P, Q, etc. for cultivation, and from 2013, it leased it to R for cultivation.

Then, O.O.

arrow