The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant is not operated by an entertainment drinking house, but operated by a music video production room, and the court below found the charge and found the defendant guilty, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Article 36 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 21 subparagraph 8 (c) of the Enforcement Decree of the Food Sanitation Act provide that "business of cooking and selling mainly alcoholic beverages, in which customers are allowed to singing: An entertainment bar business: a business of cooking and selling mainly alcoholic beverages, where workers engaged in entertainment may be employed, amusement facilities may be installed, and customers may sing or dance." Article 2 subparagraph 8 of the Music Industry Promotion Act provides that "a business of planning and producing music records, music files, music video products, and music video files" refers to a business of planning, producing, or reproducing music records, music files, music video products, and music video files. Whether a business establishment is a music record, music video production facility, or entertainment bar or sing bar shall be determined on the basis of the type of conduct and the substance of the same business as the substance of a service provided."

In light of the following circumstances, it is difficult for the police to distinguish the signboard, internal facility, and structure of the instant place of business from the singing room, singing bar, or entertainment tavern. On September 27, 2012, at the time the instant place of business was controlled on September 27, 2012, customers who had been in a five-time room of the instant place of business were singing and singing to the control police officer, who used the instant place of business with the knowledge of the instant place of business as an ordinary entertainment bar or entertainment tavern.