logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.02 2016노1792
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)
Text

The judgment below

The part against the Defendants is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment for four years, Defendant B and C, respectively.

Reasons

1. Progress of lawsuit and the scope of trial of this court;

A. On February 16, 2015, the prosecutor of the lower court’s proceeding 1) omitted all of the part of the “stock company” in the name of the AI Co., Ltd. with respect to the duties of Defendant A, who is a public official, in collusion with Defendant A and B.

The outside director D accepted a bribe of KRW 770 million from the above 770 million for support payments. Defendant B concealed money of KRW 188 million out of the above 770 million to the disposal of criminal proceeds. Defendant C gave and receiving a bribe of KRW 77770 million from the above 70 million. Defendant C gave and receiving a bribe of KRW 7770 million from the above 70 million for the reason that the crime was facilitated by Defendant A and B, Defendant C was in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery), violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery), Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds, etc.; Defendant C was indicted for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and a fine of KRW 500 million; Defendant C was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 billion for each of the above 1 billion charges and a fine of KRW 400 billion (one billion with KRW 600 billion) on March 2, 2015.

B. Prior to remand, Defendant A and B appealed each of the above facts charged on the ground that the lower judgment which convicted each of the above facts charged was erroneous or erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles, and that the sentencing is excessive, Defendant C appealed appealed on the ground that the sentencing is excessive.

arrow