logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2016.08.12 2016고단48
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 12, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the Daejeon District Court Support on November 12, 2007, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the Seoul East District Court on November 16, 2007.

[2] On February 3, 2016, the Defendant driven a gallon in a state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.086% from a portion of approximately 3km to a 0.086% in Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, a trade name in front of the mar cafeteria-gun, Masan-gun, Masan-gun, Masan-gun, Masan-gun, Masan-gun, the Defendant driven a gallon in a state of alcohol alcohol concentration to that degree.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the provision of “the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice” and driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the same provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition, a report on the results of regulating drinking driving, a report on the situation of a driver who takes the main duty, and a report on investigation (Attachment to a black stuff image);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (verification of the same type of force), and application of each of the statutes governing the judgment;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the order of provisional payment is a criminal record of the same kind, but confession, depth, reflects the degree of depth, and choose a fine in consideration of the frequency, frequency, etc. of drinking alcohol.

In this context, the defendant's age, sex, family environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered.

arrow