1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is based on the donation from September 24, 201.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 16, 1985, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff’s small Arabic area D with respect to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) owned by the Plaintiff’s Cho G, and on December 15, 1988, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 12, 1988 under the Defendant’s husband’s husband’s husband deceased E.

B. The registration of transfer of ownership was completed on March 28, 2006 under the name of the Plaintiff and the network E on March 30, 2006 with respect to the land size of 131 square meters in Hongcheon-gun G, Hongcheon-gun, G, H 100 square meters, and I 5417 square meters in I Y (hereinafter “each of the instant water property”).

C. On February 14, 2006, the network E borrowed KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff, and the Defendant drafted a loan certificate to the effect that it guarantees this (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”). D.

On September 20, 2011, the network E died, and on September 24, 201, the Defendant drafted a letter stating, “The Plaintiff, etc., decided to do so under a joint name by mutual agreement with the type of property of the E” (hereinafter referred to as “each letter of this case”) between J, K, Plaintiff, L, M, N, and the deceased’s spouse P, a model of the network E (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant, etc.”).

E. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 21, 201 with respect to each of the instant real estate and each of the instant water molds, each of which was based on inheritance by consultation and division.

F. Since then, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer for each real estate of this case on November 15, 201, which was based on the gift made on November 11, 201 in the name of the Plaintiff on November 15, 201.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion that each of the real estate of this case was originally owned by a clan or by the network E, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed under the name of E, thereby preserving the inherited property at the time.