logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단1367
부정수표단속법위반
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant operated a household store selling “D” in the wife population C, and as a person who, from December 7, 1982, entered into a check contract under the name of the Defendant with the present branch of the National Bank, and the Defendant, from December 7, 1982, has traded the check.

On August 24, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “E”, the check amount “5,00,000,000”, and the date of issuance “1 January 4, 2017” under the name of the Defendant.

The check was presented on January 4, 2017, which was within the period for presentation, but the Defendant issued the check at least 20,000,000 won per unit four times in total, including the fact that the check was not paid due to the shortage of deposit. However, the Defendant issued the check at least 20,00,000 won per face value per unit four times, and did not pay the shortage of deposit.

As a person who operated a furniture sales warehouse of "D" in the wife population C, the Defendant of "2017 Highest 1707", the Defendant entered into a check contract with the present branch of the National Bank and the Defendant from December 7, 1982 and entered into a check contract under the name of the Defendant.

On August 24, 2016, the Defendant issued a copy of the check number “F” as “F” check amount, “5,000,000,” and “date of issuance” under the name of the Defendant as “F” and “F on February 7, 2017.”

The above bearer presented payment on February 7, 2017 within the period for presentation. However, the Defendant issued a check with a total of three face value of 15,000,000 won per check over three occasions as shown in the List of Crimes 2 on the same day, including that the Defendant did not pay due to the shortage of deposit, and did not pay the shortage of deposit.

2. The above facts charged are not prosecuted in a case where a person who issues or prepares a check pursuant to Article 2(4) of the Illegal Check Control Act, among crimes falling under Article 2(2) and Article 2(1) of the same Act, collects the check.

According to the records, the records are examined.

arrow