beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 20, 2014, the Plaintiff (acquisition of Class 1 ordinary drivers’ licenses on November 16, 1979, and Class 1 drivers’ licenses on May 18, 1985) driven a vehicle B in the vicinity of the intersection of the long-distance distance in the original Yandong-Eup, Bosung-do, under the influence of alcohol by 0.239% of the blood alcohol content on July 20, 2014.
B. Accordingly, on August 12, 2014, the Defendant issued the instant disposition against the Plaintiff, revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license as of August 31, 2014.
C. On September 22, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal on September 22, 2014, but was dismissed by the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on October 28, 2014.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 6, 8, 10, and 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The plaintiff's assertion on the day of this case was sought to appoint a proxy engineer to return to the school, with meals, in order to do so in a manner that can safely return back to the school after being well-beingd. However, due to the low attendance of a proxy engineer and waiting for a proxy engineer, he was waiting for a shoulder. However, the plaintiff's blood alcohol concentration was found to have been 0.239%, while driving the rest of the house that he thought that he thought that he would have her to return to the school and want to have her face reported her face. However, considering the fact that the plaintiff was suffering from mergers, such as training high blood pressure, mixed blood transfusion, and urology, etc., due to the increase in the driver's license, the plaintiff's personal taxi and her family members who were supported by the plaintiff and her family members, were unable to meet the driver's license of this case, and the plaintiff and her family members who were supported by the plaintiff and her family members who were supported by the defendant and her family members.