logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.24 2019가단5082994
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive movable insurance contract with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "non-party company"). On July 14, 2018, the non-existence of the name of the defendant's employee entered into a joint movable insurance contract with regard to "CNC Automatic Line" in the Daejeon U.S. E factory located in the Daejeon U.S. E., and on July 12:32, 2018, the accident occurred where the above CNC Automatic Group was destroyed due to the fire while the non-existence of name of the defendant's employee was cut back to the vicinity of the plant, and the plaintiff paid 491,063,603 won of the insurance money to the non-party company as the insurer. The defendant is a tort under Article 750 of the Civil Act or an employer under Article 756 of the Civil Act, and is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages in KRW 392,850,82.

2. The fact that Determination F, on July 14, 2018, engaged in cutting for the repair of air conditioners at the above plant is either difficult to dispute between the parties or by the statement of evidence No. 7. However, as to whether the Defendant ordered F to repair air conditioners at the above plant on July 14, 2018, each statement of evidence Nos. 4 and 5 is insufficient to recognize it. Since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit without any need to further examine the remainder of the issue.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow