logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.14 2014고정848
집회및시위에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, and E shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 15, 2013, the Defendants were willing to occupy and hold a lane to urge the dissolution, etc. of the NIS in the vicinity of the shooting distance in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu.

On August 15, 2013, with approximately 200 participants of other demonstration, the Defendants moved in the road on the scop of the scop around 13:25 as well as the scopicly occupying the road on the scop of the above scopic-ro, and laid down the scopet stating the 'F removed f.p. heading f. heading f. heading f. heading f.

Accordingly, the director of the security division ordered by the chief of the police station to voluntarily dissolve around 13:25 of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, the first dispersion order around 13:29 of the Act, the second dispersion order around 13:32 of the Act, and the third dispersion order around 13:34 of the Act on Assembly and Demonstration.

Nevertheless, the Defendants continued to occupy the roads among the three-distances, without complying with the above dispersion order, until they are arrested at around 14:35 on the same day, with approximately 200 participants of other demonstrations.

As above, the Defendants conspired with approximately 200 participants in the demonstration and interfered with the traffic of the land and the dispersion order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police protocol on G, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on information situation;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 185 of the Criminal Act; Article 24 Subparag. 5 and Article 20 (2) of the Assembly and Demonstration Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments in each of the above crimes);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow