The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is the driver of C Substitute CA110-wheeled vehicle.

At around 13:10 on March 8, 2013, the Defendant was working in the Cheongyang-si, Mayang-si, 175-14, the head of the Manyang-si, Manyang-si, Cheongyang-ri, Cheongyang-ri, Cheongyang-ri, Cheongyang-ri.

At this point, a person engaged in driving as a one-lane road has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle along the rear side of the vehicle driving.

Nevertheless, the Defendant temporarily suspended a bus, other than the accident, which was in progress, brought the victim E (30 years old and South) who walked from the bus in the right space of the bus while moving ahead of it, with the front wheels of the accident vehicle.

As a result, the above E suffered bodily injury, such as a fluoral fluor and fluoral fluoral fluor, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, the criminal agreement on May 6, 2013, which stated the victim's expression of wish not to punish the defendant, can be acknowledged to be submitted to this court. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.