logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.12.24 2020가합11859
소유권말소등기
Text

1. For each real estate indicated in the indication of the attached real estate from the plaintiff, the defendant shall support the Gwangju District Court's netcheon.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of real estate sale, lease, and sale, and the Defendant is a person who owns the shares of the site of the instant building from 1st to 9 floors underground among net C and D ground net E buildings (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. On October 22, 2019, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase the shares of the six to nine floors of the instant building site (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate” in this case’s building that the Defendant owned from the Defendant, and 2.5 billion won of the purchase price, and agreed to enter into a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase the shares of the instant building site for the instant building (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate”). Within one month, the costs of electrical construction, fire-fighting construction, and joint construction under construction are to be borne by the Defendant. Within one month, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with respect to the remaining first to five floors of the instant building owned by the Defendant (hereinafter

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). C.

The Plaintiff paid the purchase price of KRW 2.5 billion to the Defendant by November 29, 2019, and the Defendant completed the transfer registration of ownership in the name of the Plaintiff on November 29, 2019 (hereinafter “instant transfer registration”).

On the same day, the Plaintiff completed each registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “instant trust registration”) based on trust in F.D.

The Defendant did not pay the price for the joint construction of the instant building, and did not conclude a sales contract with the Plaintiff for the remaining commercial buildings.

The plaintiff on April 3, 2020 and the same month.

4. On 14. Each content certificate, urged the Defendant to perform the obligations under the instant sales contract, and expressed his/her intent to cancel the instant sales contract upon nonperformance. By serving a copy of the complaint of this case, the Defendant expressed his/her intent to cancel the instant sales contract again.

The duplicate of the complaint of this case was served on May 29, 2020.

【Legal basis for recognition】

arrow