1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff lent KRW 90,000,000 to the Defendant

claim and seek the return of the loan against the defendant.

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff's account at the defendant's account as of September 10, 2010, and the same year

9.9.20,000,000 won, and the total of 10,000,000 won on April 10, 199 of the same year, and the total of 50,000,000 won on October 15, 19 of the same year, may be recognized.

However, at the time of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant received a loan of KRW 40 million from the Defendant’s father C on September 17, 2010, and KRW 70,000,00 from October 4, 2010, and KRW 30,000 from the Defendant’s father C on September 17, 2010, and KRW 30,000,000, and C transferred money as above by presenting a certified copy of the Defendant’s resident registration with the Defendant’s resident registration that “if the Defendant has failed to repay,

Therefore, the Defendant expressed to the Plaintiff the intent to borrow money.

such authority shall not be deemed to have been delegated to C.

There is also a lack of recognition and there is no evidence to recognize it differently.

Ultimately, the plaintiff's above assertion that he borrowed money from the plaintiff is not the defendant but C. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion that he lent money to the defendant is without merit.

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.