1. As to KRW 309,698,685 and KRW 80,805,382 among the Plaintiff, Defendant A shall be the year from September 18, 2014 to the day of full payment.

1. The part of the claim against the defendant A

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Part of the claim against the defendant B

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is jointly and severally liable to pay the above debt since the defendant B guaranteed the defendant A's obligation under paragraph (1).

As to this, Defendant B, while recognizing the fact that Defendant A's joint and several obligations are guaranteed, asserts that it is impossible to respond to the Plaintiff's request.

B. The facts that Defendant B received the adjudication of bankruptcy on October 29, 2007 from the Daegu District Court, and the exemption decision on January 9, 2008 (Tgu District Court Decision 2007Hadan5341, 2007 Da5341, 2007) are either a dispute between the parties or acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings.

Article 566 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act provides that "the obligor who has been exempted shall be exempted from all obligations to the bankruptcy creditors except for the distribution under the bankruptcy procedure." Thus, the joint and several liability obligation owed by the defendant B to the plaintiff was exempted in accordance with the above decision of exemption.

C. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is dismissed as it is without merit.