1. The Defendant’s KRW 255,873,480 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from November 21, 2014 to February 5, 2015.

1. Where there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim or comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers), the plaintiff is a person who manufactures electronic parts with the trade name of "B," and the defendant is a company that manufactures and sells electronic parts, etc., and the plaintiff has manufactured and supplied electronic parts equivalent to 255,873,480 won (including value-added tax) to the defendant from July 20, 2014 to November 20, 2014. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff 25,873,480 won with 25,873,480 won, and damages for delay calculated with 5% annual interest rate from the day following the date of the final supply of goods for which the plaintiff seeks to pay for the plaintiff from Nov. 21, 2014 to February 5, 2015.

2. As to the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant is responsible for compensating the defendant for damages caused by defects in electronic parts supplied by the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff asserts that the defendant's damage claim against the plaintiff is offset against the amount equivalent to the plaintiff's claims for the payment of unpaid goods against the defendant by using the defendant's damage claim against the plaintiff as the automatic claim, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that defects occurred in the electronic parts supplied by the plaintiff. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit without further review

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.