Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the owner of "D" in Osan City C and C, and the defendant A is the employee of the above establishment.

Defendant

B shall rent the above businesses around September 6, 2016, prepare shower rooms, etc. inside the smuggling, prepare Defendant A as employee around December of the same year, employ women as sexual traffic women, and allow Defendant A to arrange sexual traffic. Defendant A shall receive 100,000 won from male customers who found at the above businesses around March 28, 2017, receive 10,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from male customers who found at the above businesses around March 22:20, 2017, and guide them into a smuggling, and Defendant E (23 , Thailand) who is a woman of sexual traffic enter a smuggling with the Red Sea.

The act of sexual intercourse with the self-employed guest was allowed.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to site photographs, sex trafficking female passports, copies of bankbooks, and copies of real estate lease contracts;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Selection of fines under Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. The acts of arranging sexual traffic for the reasons of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are related to the inducement of a workhouse, requires strict punishment because of the lack of social harm, such as the commercialization of sex and undermining a sound sexual culture and good morals, etc., Defendant A has a history of being punished for the same criminal record, Defendant B has no history of being punished for the same criminal record, Defendant B has no history of being punished for the same criminal record, the defendants have a mistake, the fact that the defendants are recognized for and against the defendants, and other factors such as the period, size, and degree