A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:30 on March 2, 2013, the Defendant reported that the Defendant was pushed up with C at the “E” restaurant located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu D, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, and that the Defendant was flicked with C, and that the Defendant f(55 years of age) and flicked, followed the victim’s face by drinking flick, and assaulted three times of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Around 05:30 on March 2, 2013, the Defendant, along with F and the victim C (the 52-year old age), performed drinking at the “E” restaurant located in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, as well as F and the victim C (the 52-year-old age-). On the ground that the victim driven away from his restaurant, and her left part of the body was pushed down on five occasions after the victim driven away from his restaurant, the Defendant, in his hand, caused the victim’s bodily injury, such as “the head damage of an unknown head,” which requires the victim’s treatment for about two weeks.

2. According to the judgment witness C, F’s each legal statement, and the police statement of G, the Defendant is recognized to have sleeped and her butt her, left her, etc.

However, there is a witness C and F’s partial statement and diagnosis (investigative Records No. 60 pages) that seem to be consistent with the facts charged due to the Defendant’s assault. However, according to the results of the inquiry inquiry into the witness C and F’s partial statement and the H rehabilitation medical department, C visited the H rehabilitation medical department on March 28, 2013, 26 days after the date of the instant case, and issued a medical certificate, and the doctor I issued the medical certificate, asserting that C complained of a documentary evidence, and responded to the two-way diagnosis according to other circumstances.