logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.28 2017고단1459
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, on January 5, 2017, posted on E-dong B B B B B in the north of the Republic of Korea on the following: “B’s husband and the victim C committed an act of unfolding the victim;” and, for the purpose of slandering the victim, it was difficult for the Defendant to break down the Defendant’s prior to the towing.

It is so far as she has abandoned her or her father, so that she can do so.

I ambling only and her answer.

Habaman Mebain

This year, how past the year was flick, has been flick and has been flick from middle schools.

I.

그래서 이름도 개명하고 새 출발한 거라는 데 남편과 아이가 있음에도 불구하고 전 남친과 뒹굴고 좋았다고

The term "the old family" refers to a frat of the body of the Gu when the body is called, and the old family called "the Gu family" is too well-frat, and the grat of the house was frat of the first day, and the grat of the house was frat.

In doing so, beyond the crypted case of South Korea's house gypted case, ebbbrugs or sagbrugs.

The comments posted comments on the comments “..........”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by exposing public facts through information and communication network with the aim of slandering the person.

2. Determination

(a) Penalty provisions: Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

C. The victim expressed his intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant after the prosecution of this case.

arrow