1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial while filing an appeal for the citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significant to the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the evidence submitted in the court of

Therefore, the reasoning for this Court regarding this case is that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

[Revision] Article 26(7) of the Fire-Fighting System Act provides that “A qualified technical qualification holder under Article 25(1) of the Fire-Fighting System Act and a manager registered as technical human resources for management business pursuant to Article 29(2) shall faithfully conduct self-inspection.”

In addition, not only qualified technical personnel under Article 25(1) of the Fire-Fighting Systems Act but also a manager registered as technical personnel of management business under Article 29(2) is obligated to faithfully perform the duties of self-inspection. In the case of self-inspection of fire-fighting facilities, not only the manager but also the manager of fire-fighting systems belonging to the manager is included.

In the first instance trial judgment, the following writing boxes should be added between the 7th page 12 of the judgment document and the 7th page.

The purport of Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance is, “,” and the following is added to “a person who becomes a fire-fighting system manager, subject to strict qualifications and testing prescribed in Articles 26 and 27 of the Fire-Fighting Systems Act, may cancel or suspend his qualification in certain cases related to the work in consideration of the public nature of the work.”

In violation of Article 49 subparagraph 4 of the Fire-Fighting System Act and Article 25 (2) of the Fire-Fighting System Act.