logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.05.18 2015가합106859
채무부존재확인
Text

1. On March 10, 2015, the Plaintiff is in relation to a fire that occurred from the outer equipment installation space of the outer wall of the first floor of the building as indicated in the attached Form.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Pursuant to Article 23 of the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “the Condominium Buildings Act”), the Plaintiff is a management body comprised of sectional owners of the attached buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, an aggregate building, located in Seongdong-gu, Seoul. D is employed on May 1, 2014 by the Plaintiff and served as the head of the building management office until June 14, 2016. The Defendant is a building located next to the instant building, located next to the instant building, and is a person who operates a factory of “G” in the name of “G” (hereinafter “instant factory”).

B. On the outer wall of the 1st floor of the instant building, there was a space in which the owners of the instant building jointly use the air conditioners can install the air conditioners (the space in which the air conditioners are installed; hereinafter “instant common part”). The common part of the instant building was located outside the air conditioners installed by H (hereinafter “H”) for air conditioners with air conditioners installed by 202 (hereinafter “202”) among the instant building and 210 (hereinafter “210”) among the instant building, which are the owners of air conditioners installed by the air conditioners installed by H (hereinafter “H”).

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant companies,” including the outdoor equipment of heading 202 and heading 210, refers to “each of the instant companies,” and H and I collectively referred to as “each of the instant companies.”

On March 10, 2015, around 18:06, one of the outdoor equipment of this case was destroyed and damaged by a part of the factory of this case. Various machinery, public appliances, office fixtures and inventory assets (hereinafter “instant fire assets”) owned by the Defendant, which were located within the factory of this case, were destroyed by fire or fire.

The above order shall be written.

arrow