1. The Defendant’s KRW 2 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from September 23, 2015 to July 12, 2016.

1. According to the fact that there is no dispute over liability for damages, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 5 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), each statement or image of Gap's 2, 3, and 5 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness Eul's testimony, and the whole purport of pleadings, the plaintiff was found to have taken a bicycle riding (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff's bicycle riding") at a certain speed along with members of the bicycle club (including C) on the road No. 118-ro, both weeks from August 17, 2015 to the 118-ro, both weeks. However, the plaintiff was found to have taken a bicycle riding on the right side of the plaintiff's bicycle riding at around 21:30 on the same day, and the defendant, a member of the same club, as Gap's own bicycle riding, was found to have brought the plaintiff'

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the above tort.

2. Scope of liability for damages

가. 원고 주장의 요지 이 사건 사고로 인하여 원고의 자전거 휠이 꿀렁이고, 변속기 이상으로 인한 변속 트러블이 발생하였으며, 프레임의 도장부분이 까졌으므로, 피고는 원고에게 손해배상으로 자전거 교체비용 9,270,000원(=원고의 자전거 구입비용 6,780,000원 휠 구입비용 2,490,000원), 약 10개월간의 자전거 대차비용 15,776,000원, 위자료 300만 원을 지급할 의무가 있다.

B. In general, in a case where a property damage is caused by a tort, the market price at the time of the loss when the article was destroyed, and in a case where the article is damaged, the repair cost or the cost of restoration, or in a case where it is impossible to repair or restore the original state, or in a case where the cost is excessive, the exchange value reduced due

(See Supreme Court Decision 95Da38233 Decided January 23, 1996). According to the respective descriptions or images of Evidence A Nos. 1, 4, 7, and 8, the Plaintiff’s bicycle of this case on May 6, 2015.