1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is examined as follows, and even if evidence submitted by the plaintiff is presented in this court, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

【The part to be used by the Defendant” was entirely used as “the network B,” and the Defendant of the fourth four pages was written with “the Defendant.”

It shall be added to the last part of the basic facts of paragraph 1 as follows:

D. The deceased B died on April 19, 2017 while the instant lawsuit was pending, and the Defendants, their successors, taken over the instant lawsuit. The Defendants, as their successors, took over the instant lawsuit from 4th one to 3th one as follows.

Defendant AC, the inheritor of the network B pursuant to this Section, has the obligation to pay each of the 8,025,000 won to the Plaintiff and the Appointors listed in the No. 2 through No. 14, and 24,075,000 won to the Appointors listed in the No. 15, and 5,350,000 won to the Plaintiff and the Appointors listed in the No. 2 through No. 14, respectively, and 16,050,00 won to the Appointers listed in the No. 15, respectively.

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.