logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.02 2015나5134
부정경쟁행위금지 등
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The defendant shall include each of the names listed in the separate sheet and each of the above names.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are as stated in the part of “1. Basic Facts” among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

A. Two pages of the judgment of the first instance court.

After the first paragraph of this Article, "Minland C is one of the fourth musical areas of Brazil, which was launched from London in 1981, and had been performing long-term performances for twenty (20) years at the exclusive Cateral area of New York in the United States of America, New York, and 9,000 times until May 11, 2002 at the exclusive Cater of London wait."

B. Two pages of the judgment of the first instance court.

The plaintiff, who is engaged in the planning and production of performances, concluded a performance license agreement with the non-party company since 2003, thereby obtaining the exclusive performance right in the Republic of Korea with respect to musical C through this, and performing musical C in the Republic of Korea.

4. Rad 1 of the first instance judgment.

The following shall be added to the paragraphs:

E. The current status of the performance and advertisement publicity in the Republic of Korea of the musical community C in which the Plaintiff performed is performing is as follows:

1) From 2003 to 2008, the domestic performances of musical cities in English were conducted in Seoul, Suwon, Daegu, Busan, Daejeon, Gwangju, etc. The number of performances was 191, 204, 58, 2007, 140, 172, 2008, and 146, 59, 2009, 59, 2011, 67, 2012. Meanwhile, from 2014 to 2003, 209, 201, 30, 201, 204, 201, 30, 201, 204, 149, 149, 2011, 149, 2012, 2014, 30, 204, 205, 294, 2014, 294, 2014).

In addition, the plaintiff's advertisement of TV such as MBC, SBS, YTN, joint and several liability of KBS, and daily newspapers such as Central Day, Korean daily newspapers, and Seoul newspapers, etc.

arrow