logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.13 2018가합547977
퇴직금 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a contract under which companies engaged in the import, sale, etc. of 'I' brand products, such as clothes, etc., companies operating department stores or leaflets, etc., and companies operating department stores or leaflets under a special purchase transaction agreement with companies operating department stores or leaflets, and the Defendant purchases on credit the imported goods, sells them from department stores or Arabics operated by it, and pay the Defendant the remainder after deducting the fee from the sales revenue.

B. Along with the plaintiffs, the defendant's store has been operated within the department store or set up a sales consignment contract with the sales store manager who sells the I products and had the sales manager perform the above sales management and sales of the I products.

B. The Plaintiffs entered into a sales consignment agreement with the Defendant, around the beginning day of each of the “period of service by Plaintiff’s service and the “period of service” in the “period of service” in the annexed sheet for calculation of retirement allowances, with the content that the Plaintiffs would operate the above stores and sell the Defendant’s goods, and receive a certain percentage of commission fees from the Defendant for sales performance (hereinafter “fee”). From the beginning day of each of the above agreements, the Plaintiffs performed their duties as sales managers who sell the goods within each of the above stores, and terminated their duties on the end day of each of the same columns.

C. Although there are somewhat differences between the plaintiffs' each sales consignment contract entered into and entered into with the defendant and each sales consignment contract, the contents are as follows.

Article 1 (Purpose of Contract) The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a trade order and to pursue joint prosperity development by providing for all matters concerning sales services between Gap (referring to the defendant; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Eul (referring to the plaintiff; hereinafter the same shall apply) and complying with the mutual trust and good faith.

Article 2 (Places of Business) A place of business shall be located in each store.

arrow