beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. 기초사실 이 법원이 이 부분에 관하여 설시할 이유는, 제1심판결의 제4면 제8행 중 “(20M9”를 “(20M)”으로, 제5면 제9행 중 “정원코드”를 “전원코드”로, 제5면 제20행 중 “꺽임”을 “꺾임”으로 각 정정하는 외에는, 제1심판결의 이유 중 해당 부분(1. 기초사실) 기재와 같으므로, 민사소송법 제420조 본문에 의하여 이를 그대로 인용한다. 2. 원고의 주장 요지 이 법원이 이 부분에 관하여 설시할 이유는 제1심판결의 이유 중 해당 부분(2. 원고의 주장 기재와 같으므로, 민사소송법 제420조 본문에 의하여 이를 그대로 인용한다.
3. Determination
A. (i) Determination of whether a defect in the installation or preservation of a structure by a defendant is liable for damages due to a defect in the installation or preservation of a structure refers to a situation in which a structure fails to have safety ordinarily required according to its intended purpose. In determining whether such safety is satisfied, the determination shall be based on whether the installer or custodian of the structure has fulfilled his/her duty to take protective measures to the extent generally required by social norms in proportion to the risk of the structure (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Da61615, Feb. 11, 2010). The burden of proof of the existence of the defect lies on the victim.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2014Da205591 Decided October 30, 2014 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Da205591, Oct. 30, 201). The following facts or circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the Shesheet Sheet, the above basic facts, and the overall purport of the evidence and arguments, are as follows: ① The fire extinguishing unit of the instant fire consists of the first and third floors underground (the building where the instant fire occurred consists of the first floor and the third floor above the ground). However, it is specific.