All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants to each punishment (defendant A: fine of KRW 3 million; penalty of KRW 6 million; penalty of KRW 500,000; and penalty of KRW 500,000; and confiscation) is unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as the instant crime, is deemed to be so severe that there is no social harm, such as undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals; (b) the Defendants are recognized as committing the instant crime, and the Defendants are not guilty; (c) the period of the instant crime is not relatively long; and (d) the Defendants are deemed to have not been able to profit from the instant crime; (c) Defendant B is an employee; and (d) the degree of participation in the instant crime is relatively small; and (d) the degree of participation in the instant crime is not relatively more severe; and (e) all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case’s records, such as the Defendants’ age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the instant crime, are not recognized to be unfair because each sentence of the lower court is too uneasible. Therefore, the Prosecutor’

3. In conclusion, it is clear that the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is groundless. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.