logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.01.11 2018고정714
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, around 20:40 on May 1, 2018, around 20:40, at the 3rd floor of Kimpo-si Kimpo-si, the CCTV was installed on the bridge in front of the entrance of the third floor of Kimpo-Spo Kim, and the church pastor E was removed from the floor by cutting down the bridge, and thus, the victim F, who is the person in charge of the church facility expenses, attempted to attach the glass of the church building by cutting off the bridge, the victim F, who was the person in charge of the church facility expenses, failed to stop this, shall promptly stop the victim's right shoulder, and the defendant B, in his hand, pushed off the victim's chest part of the victim's chest and let the victim go beyond the floor.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed so that there was no one in the two-day open in order to treat the victim about 2 weeks, and her m, m, m, and so on, the Defendants suffered damage to the reputation of the following arms, which is in detail known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Written diagnosis of each injury (No. 4, 5);

1. Emergency medical services log;

1. Comprehensively taking account of each of the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendants inflicted bodily injury on the victim by exercising the same force as the facts constituting a crime. In full view of the situation at the time of the instant crime committed by each of the above evidence, the method and degree of exercising force, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the act cannot be deemed as self-defense or legitimate act, and the Defendants’ assertion cannot be deemed as having reached the extent of causing bodily injury to the victim. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

1. Relevant Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the same Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants bearing litigation costs: Defendant A with reasons for sentencing under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow