(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고단3336

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고단3336

업무상횡령등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 2013 to July 16, 2014, the Defendant was engaged in managing stores, such as sales of goods and sales proceeds, as a store store located in the victim (owner)B from July 2013 to July 2014.

1. On December 26, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract to lease the 602, 603, and 604 of the 6th floor of the 3th floor of the 3th floor of the 3th floor of the 3th floor of the 3th floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 1st floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 4th floor of the 4th floor of the 4th floor of the 4th floor of the 4th floor of the 1st floor of the 4th floor of the 1st floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 3th floor of the 4th floor of the 4th floor of the 196th floor of the 3th floor of the 2014.

After that, the lessor of the commercial monthly rent contract printed out by the defendant as above has stamped D's seal created by the above real estate office, and has affixed D's seal next to the lessee's column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a commercial monthly rent contract in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On February 2014, the Defendant: (a) had been urged to submit a contract at the office of the victimized company located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu to submit the contract; (b) had an employee H, who knew of the forgery, exercised the forged monthly rent contract as if it was duly formed.

3. On February 1, 2014, the Defendant entered into a false statement with I, a representative director of the victimized company, at the same place as the above paragraph 2, stating that “The amount of deposit KRW 10 million per month and KRW 7 million per month, was changed to KRW 10 million per month, because he/she entered into a contract on a fake-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si.”

However, the defendant has already been.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2014.10.23 2013가단27296

-수원지방법원안산지원 2020.08.06 2019고단2546

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.07.22 2014고단553

-서울북부지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고단2831

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.18 2018고정418