1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,771,696 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 8, 2016 to January 26, 2018.

1. Whether liability for damages has arisen and been limited;

A. The recognition (1) around 08:40 on April 8, 2016, Nonparty B driven the C urban bus vehicles owned by the bank for the settlement of accounts and stopped on the front of the bus stops in the Round Station in order to let passengers get off and get off the bus.

(2) B opened the rear door to allow passengers to get off the bus, and the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff, 1936) who was on board the bus was moving to the rear door to get out of the bus stop at the bus stops and opened the rear door to get out of the stairs.

(3) However, without confirming whether B had completed the passengers' getting off, the Plaintiff, who was coming to the wind of the above city bus without opening the back door, fell from the above city bus and was injured by an injury, such as a stoves, stoves, external, and pulvers, etc., which require eight weeks’ treatment.

(4) The defendant is a mutual aid association which has concluded a mutual aid agreement with respect to the above urban bus.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 12 (including virtual number), Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, B had a duty of care to prevent safety accidents due to ascertaining that the Plaintiff, a passenger, completed the safe unloading of the bus, and closing and departing from the bus back.

The accident of this case started with the above city bus without checking whether the plaintiff completed the vehicle due to negligence, and opened the back door. Therefore, the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the above B.

There are circumstances in which the plaintiff could not immediately get out of the elderly women.

In such a case, B should pay more attention so that passengers can safely get out of the elderly.