The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant to the punishment (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment. The defendant made a statement that he made a confession of the crime of this case and divided his wrong depth, and hardened. The crime of this case committed by the defendant is one of the concurrent crimes as stated in the first head of the crime of this case as stated in the judgment below. However, there are no circumstances to consider the crime of this case, such as the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. On the other hand, prior to the crime of this case, the defendant has already been punished for imprisonment three times for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and in particular, on April 17, 2007, the defendant had been sentenced for eight months for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and was sentenced for eight months for the execution of the sentence on July 17, 2008, despite the past record of the execution of the sentence, the court below repeatedly committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, considering the circumstances and circumstances of the first crime of this case.

I would like to say.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.