logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.10.04 2013고단3950
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 2, 2005, the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review on May 2, 2005, which constituted a violation of vehicle operation restriction by an employee of a defendant specified in the facts charged, lost its retroactive effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow