logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.22 2016나50204
물품대금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the part concerning “E” in the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as “G”; and (b) the part concerning “E” in the third part to 2.B. 7 are as follows; and (c) it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The height of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be from No. 3 to No. 2 to No. 7 as follows:

B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as indicated in the evidence No. 8, the lower court rendered a judgment dismissing all the Defendants’ claims on October 12, 2017, by claiming against the Plaintiff for damages arising from defects in Acrylic resin, etc., which are the raw materials for the textile processing of this case supplied by the Plaintiff as the District Court Decision 2015Da116629, and that the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on November 7, 2017 by failing to appeal by the Defendants. Accordingly, the allegation of the damage claim in this case as an automatic claim for offset is not allowed against the res judicata effect.

Therefore, the defendants' assertion of set-off is without merit.

3. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

arrow