A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an employee of the Da, “C,” and the Defendant was in charge of the business of supporting the PD in the course of photographing the drama in relation to D Company, and the victim E (V, 21 years old) was working as an assistant intern at the location of the drama shooting.

At around 03:30 on January 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sought beer and beer in a string room where the victim of Gel, who was in F at F, has been silentd; (b) performed drinking together with the victim; and (c) had the victim expressed alcohol to the victim, who was diving, and the victim was forced to commit an indecent act.

The defendant is exempted from all the parts of the victim who is diving, and the chest of the victim who is going on the body of the victim takes part in several times, and the victim can not be seen as "I am."

Although the body of the Defendant was sealed with two arms, the phrase “one-school defect”, etc. was sent to the Defendant, and the victim’s chest, her, her butt, sound, etc. was sent to several times, and her fingers were collected in a sound book.

이에 피해자는 두 팔과 무릎 등으로 피고인의 몸을 밀고 찼음에도 피고인은 피해자의 몸을 눌러 움직이지 못하게 한 후, 피해자의 팬티를 벗긴 다음 입으로 피해자의 가슴, 성기 등을 빨고 피해자의 음부에 피고인의 손가락을 집어넣었다.

As a result, the defendant committed an act of putting the victim's fingers into the victim's sexual organ.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part of the trial record on the first trial by court;

1. The legal statement of the witness H and the legal statement of the witness E among the second public trial records;

1. Recording notes (as of February 20, 2015), recording records (as of April 7, 2015), and recording records (as of April 7, 2015) (the defendant and defense counsel merely did an act of omitting the victim's sexual organ under an implied agreement with the victim, and did not commit an act of inserting the victim's sexual organ into the victim's sexual organ.)

The argument is asserted.

The evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court is recognized.