logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.05.13 2015나12398
임대료 지급 청구 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's main claim expanded in the trial and the supplementary claim are all filed.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for further determination as to the plaintiff’s conjunctive claim added in the court of first instance as to the plaintiff’s conjunctive claim in the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of

Part 2 of the Decision of the first instance court, " February 4, 2005" in Part 11 of the Decision of the second instance shall be read as " November 22, 2001".

Article 17 and 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "The defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the sum of the unpaid rent of KRW 207,200,000 and delay damages therefor, since the confirmation of this case was received, and the rent from February 1, 2008 to September 30, 2012 concerning the three units of the three units owned by the plaintiff was KRW 288,310,40, and the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above rent of KRW 288,310,40 and delay damages."

The witness J's testimony in Part 4 of the decision of the court of first instance is "the result of the request for the testimony of the witness J of the court of first instance, the testimony of the witness P of the court of first instance, the results of the request for the appraisal of the fee for Q of the party-by-court appraiser Q."

No. 19 of the decision of the court of first instance (hereinafter “No. 4.5 tons”) Nos. 19 through No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “No. 4.5 tons”) “No. 18 million won in the middle and long-term market price of the stone processing work performed by the Defendant is an essential transport tool and there is no significant difference between the market price of the stone processing work performed by the Defendant and the annual rent (in the case of the de facto 4.5 tons, the middle and long-term market price of the Plaintiff’s claim is KRW 13.2 million, the appraised annual rent of the Plaintiff’s claim is KRW 19.2 million, and the appraised annual rent is KRW 23 million in the middle and high-term market price of the Plaintiff’s claim is KRW 18 million in the annual rent of the Plaintiff’s claim and approximately KRW 21.212 million in the average annual rent).”

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court is the "court of the first instance".

Court decisions of the first instance.

arrow