Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 18, 2014, the Defendants habitually connected to “D, E,” etc., an illegal Internet gambling site at Defendant B’s house located in Busan Shipping Daegu C 301, Busan, and deposited KRW 1,00,000 to the new bank account (H) in the name of the new bank account in the name of the said gambling site operator, which is the deposit account designated by the said gambling site operator, via the National Bank account in the name of Defendant A (F). After filling the corresponding game money, the Defendants 1,00,000 won was predicted in advance in the form of “bank” or “flass” and 1 times the amount was predicted in advance, and when the Defendants predicted the game money corresponding to 301 times the amount of money in accordance with the forecast, the Defendants carried out the game money in the name of the operator.
From that time until September 30, 2014, Defendants deposited KRW 243,00,000 over 106 times in total, as shown in the list of offenses in the attached Form, and carried out illegal Internet gambling by the aforementioned method.
2. Defendant B’s non-guilty relationship with Defendant B
In addition to A, the illegal Internet gambling has been caused by the lack of gambling funds, and the defendant's South East-dong I may receive profits from the investment in the A Aggregate Extraction Project.
B. In addition, the phrase “investment defect” was false and used as gambling money by borrowing money from I under the pretext of investment.
Afterwards, the defendant, through the defendant, was believed to have been delivered to A as investment money.
As I did not receive the investment and earnings from A, A was asked to file a complaint against A, and I was faced with the situation where the above gambling was discovered.
Accordingly, the Defendant, regardless of the facts, made a false statement to Defendant Mixeds I, thereby raising gambling funds, and even though A did not deceiving I, and even if A did not know at all, he could conceal the gambling fact.