logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2018.11.20 2018고단386
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder's Name shall register any real right to real estate in the name of the trustee under the title trust agreement;

Nevertheless, on October 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered into a trust agreement with B and delivered documents, such as a certificate of seal impression necessary for the registration of transfer of ownership, to B upon request from B, who was a land owner in the middle and middle order, to the effect that “it is impossible to register the ownership under the name within the territory of the Defendant”; (b) upon receipt of a request from B to the effect that “the registration of transfer of ownership is changed under the name of the Defendant in the name of the Fransh-gu Busan Si building C. 602, which was purchased within the inside of the Republic of Korea; and (c) entered into a trust agreement with

2. On October 2015, 2015, the Defendant is obliged to obtain a loan of money under the name of D with respect to Nos. 602 of the Franchi-gu Busan Franchi-dong, Busan, where the name of the Defendant could not be known.

At the request of the purport that the documents, etc. necessary for the loan are prepared, it was accepted, and on November 2015, it was concluded that "D and C buildings 602 were leased at the location of the victim's bank located in the Nam-dong, Seosan-dong, Busan, Seosan-gu, Busan, and "D and C buildings 602."

“At the same time,” written and issued relevant documents, such as a written confirmation of the fact of a lease agreement, will enter into the Do lessee.

“A false statement is made to the effect that “B”, and B had D apply for a loan as if it would normally receive a loan from an employee in charge of the loan, and received a remittance of KRW 70 million to the Saemaul Treasury Account in the name of the Defendant used by B around November 13, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, D, etc., deceiving the victim, thereby deceiving the property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police officer with respect to D and B.

arrow