logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2018.12.20 2018고단208
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall lend any access medium with the promise of compensation.

On November 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person in an influence of name, “I wish to use his/her name to operate an Internet sports gambling business; (b) if I want to lend his/her physical card, I want to pay a fee of 40-500,000 won in proportion to the money deposited in the account; and (c) stated the password on the back of the physical card connected to the post office account in the name of the Defendant at the location of the Gangseo-gu Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City bus Terminal located in the name of the Defendant on November 2015; and (d) sent it to a woman on the name of 30 middle half-year boarding a white car.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A criminal investigation report (the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the place where remittance accounts are withdrawn);

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected (excluding punishment); Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act (excluding punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the elements of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act as well as the elements of sentencing under the grounds for sentencing, and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, the punishment is determined as ordered.

favorable sentencing factors: The fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects his mistake, that the defendant is being subject to personal rehabilitation, that the defendant is living on the basis of support for parents' families, and that he is living on the basis of support for parents' families.

In this case, the Defendant’s check card was used for the crime of Bosing, etc. (the Defendant’s check was used for the crime of Bosing, etc.) and the Defendant’s check was used for the crime (the Defendant’s check was 5,500.)

arrow