A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Suwon District Court No. 108, the Suwon District Court No. 120, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2017, which was located in 120, as the witness of the theft Defendant case against D No. 2016, No. 7151 (hereinafter referred to as “case subject to perjury”).

피고인은 변호인의 “E 이 용인시 F에 있는 G의 사무실에 왔고, 그 곳에서 피고인과 E이 소나무 처분에 대해 대화를 나눴는데, 대화가 잘 되지 않아서 당일 용인시 H에 있는 피고인의 사무실로 자리를 옮겨서 피고인과 E 사이에 다시 대화를 나눴지요” 라는 질문에 “ 예, 그렇습니다

Then, the testimony was made, “I would like to conclude a sales contract because the defendant was well fluent with E, and I would have concluded a sales contract between the defendant and G,” and the prosecutor’s “I would like to not dispose of this transaction unless I would have agreed to do so.”

The question “I did not,” “I did not first purchase and sell the G office after going to the G office.”

Therefore, even though two do not have a son relationship, they have been in the same way as H office and have been in the same way as G at that time.

I also had been H as in this case.

On December 30, 2014, including the testimony of “D”, at the time when entering into a sales contract for the trees planted in G, K, and L with the wife population J, K, and L at the time of acceptance by G, G followed the process that D and E agree on the sale of the above trees, and only after D and E reached an agreement, D and G testified to the effect that they prepared a sales contract for the above trees.

However, there was no attendance of E in the place where D and G entered into a tree sales contract, and G entered into a contract with E and D by gathering the dispute over the ownership of trees.