logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고단7225
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 7225"

1. On April 17, 2014, the Defendant, from March 31, 2014 to April 17, 2014, taken pictures of the body of another person by the same method 20 times in total, from around 31, 2014 to April 17, 2014, using the Defendant’s cellular phone (gallon No. 1) from Eclon that moved from 176 high-speed terminal lines 7 to 3 lines in subway lines 176, the Defendant taken pictures of another person’s body by the same method as indicated in the list of crimes, in the same manner as the list of crimes.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar mechanism, against his will.

"2014 Highest 7490"

2. On July 11, 2014, at around 23:42, the Defendant driven a two-lane road while under the influence of alcohol with 0.265% of blood alcohol level, and continued to drive a three-lane road in front of the distribution shopping center located in 177 as the distribution channel in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, along the two-lane distance from the terminal distance.

Since the place has a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph, after checking whether there is a person who will cut the way by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went beyond the road by taking the part of the victim C (Nam, 52 years old)’s left side side side side side side side side side of the said vehicle into the front side of the said vehicle, while the Defendant neglected to change the vehicle driving signal to a stop signal while under the influence of alcohol and went through the front side of the said vehicle’s front side side with the right side side side side of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant is driving the said car while under the influence of alcohol as above.

arrow