Text
1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the Plaintiffs’ motion for revocation of non-permission of change of status of stay is dismissed.
2. The plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff A is a ship of nationality of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter "China"), and the plaintiff B was born on April 1, 198 between the plaintiff A and the former South Korea, who was divorced from the plaintiff A on April 1, 198.
B. On August 3, 2004, Plaintiff A acquired the status of stay for permanent residence (F-5) under the status of 2 years in Korea on December 29, 2009.
Upon completion of the marriage registration, entry into the Republic of Korea with the status of stay for visiting employment (H-2) on June 18, 2008. On May 4, 2011, upon filing an application for alteration of the status of stay (F-2) as a spouse qualification of a permanent resident on May 9, 201, permission for alteration was obtained on May 9, 201, and thereafter permission was granted on March 20, 201 and May 1, 2013.
C. Plaintiff B submitted relevant documents to obtain a visa for visiting Dong (F-1) from a consular official in the military of the military of the military of the Republic of Korea, and filed an application for alteration of the status of stay as a permanent resident (F-5) on November 5, 2010 with D's invitation to enter the Republic of Korea as the status of stay for visiting Dong (F-1) on November 5, 2010, and on April 27, 2012.
As a result of conducting a fact-finding survey on the qualifications of permanent residence (F-5) against Plaintiff B, the Defendant: (a) deemed that Plaintiff A and D were the children of Plaintiff D in order to live together with Plaintiff B; and (b) obtained a visa for visiting Dong (F-1) and entered Korea by Plaintiff B; and (c) ordered Plaintiff A to leave Korea on November 27, 2013 pursuant to Articles 68(1)1, 46(1)2, and 7-2(1) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 12421, Mar. 18, 2014; hereinafter “Immigration Control Act”); (b) pursuant to Articles 68(1)1, 46(1)1, and 7(1) of the Immigration Control Act, the Defendant issued an order against the Plaintiff B to leave Korea by December 26, 2013 (hereinafter “instant order”).
E. After the Defendant issued a departure order to Plaintiff B, the Defendant decided to deny the Plaintiff B’s application for alteration of the status of stay filed on April 27, 2012.