logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.21 2015가단5126452
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 100,604,575 with respect to the Plaintiff, and the period from November 20, 2013 to February 21, 2018.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(2) The Defendant C, as the representative director of the Defendant Company, is a person in charge of safety and health management for his employees, and the Plaintiff is an employee employed by the Defendant Company. (2) The Defendant C, at the shipment site of polypropyal gift paper products in the E-1 factory located in Scropsy D, packages of approximately KRW 500 km of polypropye, a petrochemicals manufactured by E, to the Plaintiff, etc., on Pcrocon bags, and packages of four white bags in packaged containers connected with strings, and then ring them into a tank upper upper part of the tank using crost.

3) On November 20, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) carried out the work of removing plastic bags for preventing pollution on and around flaves with strings; (b) carried out the work of removing plastic bags for preventing pollution; and (c) suffered injuries, such as flaves, by left the Plaintiff’s upper part; (d) the Defendant Company’s safety rules on the removal of plastic bags for preventing pollution; (b) however, in fact, inasmuch as the removal of plastic bags is not well known, the removal of plastic bags has been carried out on the removal of plastic bags under the convenience of work.

B. The Defendant Company is the Plaintiff’s employer who is obligated to take safety consideration for workers. Defendant C, as the person responsible for safety and health management of the Defendant Company, is taking preventive measures to prevent danger due to the fall of the goods in the event of click work. However, in light of the working conditions at the site, the Defendant Company was negligent in taking safety measures or having the Plaintiff carry out the above work without improving the work method, despite being aware that workers were engaged in work in a dangerous manner to remove vinyls for preventing pollution under the click container in the form of a seal or without improving the work method.

arrow