The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the order) and rejected the Defendant’s assertion as to mental illness

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the crime of unlawful use of convenience facilities and the establishment of unlawful

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.