logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.10.18 2018나60646
유류분반환청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) by striking 5 pages 11 and 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) by inserting “the following additional parts”, the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance;

(3) The portion added on February 2, 198 by the plaintiff and the defendants that were lawfully admitted and investigated by the court of first instance is justified in finding the facts and determination of the first instance court, and there are no errors as alleged in the plaintiff's grounds for appeal. The plaintiff can seek a return of the legal reserve to the extent that there is a shortage in the legal reserve as the inheritor of the deceased. The calculation method of shortage is as follows: shortage in the legal reserve [A] x (B) - the special profit rate of the person entitled to the legal reserve x (C) - the amount of the pertinent legal reserve - the amount of donated property - B/ the amount of inherited property - the amount of inherited property 1/23 of the deceased's legal reserve : 1/60 of the deceased's legal reserve - 70 of the deceased's legal reserve - 50 of the deceased's legal reserve of inheritance - 50 of the deceased's legal reserve of inheritance - 1/60 of the deceased's legal reserve of inheritance - 1/680 of the deceased property - 3080 of the deceased property.

arrow