The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Based on its stated reasoning, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”) and the violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (quasi-rape).

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on determining the credibility of the victim’s statement, or by

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.