1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The counterclaim filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) in this court.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The part to be dismissed or added is the third 8 parallel deeds in the judgment of the court of first instance and the 19th parallel deeds in the judgment of the court of first instance, with " December 1, 2016" as " March 1, 2018."

The following shall be added to the fourth 1st instance judgment:

Article 11(1)(1) of the former Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (Act No. 10303, hereinafter the same shall apply) (i) Where rent or deposit is not reasonable due to increase or decrease in taxes, public charges, or other burdens on leasehold buildings or changes in economic circumstances, the parties concerned may request an increase or decrease in the future rent or deposit: Provided, That in cases of an increase, it shall not exceed the ratio prescribed by Presidential Decree; Article 4(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (Presidential Decree No. 22151, hereinafter the same shall apply); Article 11(1) of the same Act (Criteria for Request for Increase in Rent or deposit pursuant to Article 11(3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply); Article 11(1) of the same Act shall not exceed the amount equivalent to 00/100 of the rent or deposit at the time of request for increase in rent, which shall not exceed the amount equivalent to 100/100 of the existing rent or deposit.