1. Of the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below.

1. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking payment of the amount of 5,289,000 won for entertainment expenses and the amount of 2,140,000 won for Japan travel expenses. The first instance court rendered a judgment ordering payment of the amount of 2,140,000 won for Japan travel expenses among the plaintiff's claims, and only the defendant filed an appeal against the judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, this Court shall judge only the amount of KRW 2,140,000, which is equivalent to the Japanese travel expenses.

2. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings as to Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 4, Gap evidence No. 5, Gap evidence No. 6, and Gap evidence No. 7, and there is no counter-proof.

The plaintiff and the defendant traveled to Japan from January 27, 2016 to January 29, 2016, including one day of each person.

B. The Plaintiff paid KRW 295,400 per person each as the price for the flight ticket for the above Japanese travel, and KRW 1,181,600 per person each as the total amount.

C. The Plaintiff and the Defendant sent the following Kakao Stockholm messages:

1) At the last time of the plaintiff, only two minutes have not been processed. The liquor tax on the last day of this month ( July 31) processed in Japan: B: B:5,289,000 won:2,140 won:7,429,000 won: 7,429,000 won): the defendant Japan received the plaintiff's receipt. The defendant Japan's travel is 3) the amount of the flight space value of the defendant's clothes. The defendant's clothes value 4) the defendant's clothes value of the defendant's clothes 5) was gathered, and the case was used as the personal card-based card-based 150,000 won. The defendant's card will have been used as the national card. 6)

I would like to know 7 Plaintiff 4 as the funds accrue.

3. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant agreed to pay KRW 2,140,000 for the Japanese travel expenses, and the defendant may recognize KRW 295,400 for the defendant's flight ticket price, but it is also for the Japanese travel expenses.