1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B and incidental appeals filed by Defendant C are dismissed.

2. An appeal and an incidental appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except where the “this court” of the second instance judgment No. 17 is “No. 26, 2011,” “No. 26, 2010,” “No. 3 is “the court of the first instance,” “No. 8,” “No. 7-2 or 8,” and “No. 4, No. 12, “No. 7-2 or 11,” “No. 7-2 or 11,” and thus, it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of the first instance. Thus, this is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, each appeal of the plaintiff and the defendant Eul and incidental appeal of the defendant C are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.