logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.16 2016나6680
소유권이전등기말소등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the first instance court's 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the first instance court's "F member of this court (in the inquiry of doctor G, the result of the inquiry of doctor G, the result of the request for the examination of doctor's medical records to the president of the Gyeongbuk University Hospital, the result of the entrustment of the examination of medical records to the president of the first instance court's F member," 8, 2, and 9 "Witness" of the first instance court's 8, 21 as witness E, and the defendant added the following determination to the part of the first instance court's 420 of the first instance court's 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the first instance court's 7. [Additional determination] The defendant stated that the deceased's father of the defendant's father "It is necessary to conclude the sales contract of this case," and even if the defendant alleged that the right of representation of this case was valid after the defendant's conclusion.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow